Post by mikkh on Oct 5, 2010 8:46:10 GMT
The proposed capping of child benefit for earners over £44,000 and attempting to stop people 'earning' more than £26,000 on benefits is a bold move and one I heartily agree with
My main problem with it is..... Why wait till 2013? Does it take bureaucracy that long to implement a change, and if so, why?
There's already been mumblings from those who might be affected, but it doesn't hold water at all. Why are people who earn £800+ a week whinging that their little bit of holiday spending money might be stopped? Because that's what it is to most of them. They don't need to cash it every week like families in real need do. The present system means footballers like Wayne Rooney who earn more than £44,000 a week, never mind a year, are also entitled to child benefit, which is ludicrous beyond belief.
The mega rich could argue they pay more income tax than most people earn and therefore deserve it, but that's nonsense and amounts to pennies or fractions of pennies when scaled against what normal people earn. It's like your average person getting 2p off their weekly shop and bleating when it's stopped - it makes no difference.
As for the £26,000 cap on benefit 'earnings' - well hurrah, about time!
An unskilled worker with three or more kids can't hope to get a job that pays more than benefits - and obviously won't even try, why should they?
I don't think they've got the balls to implement these proposals though, because it more or less guarantees they won't be re-elected
My main problem with it is..... Why wait till 2013? Does it take bureaucracy that long to implement a change, and if so, why?
There's already been mumblings from those who might be affected, but it doesn't hold water at all. Why are people who earn £800+ a week whinging that their little bit of holiday spending money might be stopped? Because that's what it is to most of them. They don't need to cash it every week like families in real need do. The present system means footballers like Wayne Rooney who earn more than £44,000 a week, never mind a year, are also entitled to child benefit, which is ludicrous beyond belief.
The mega rich could argue they pay more income tax than most people earn and therefore deserve it, but that's nonsense and amounts to pennies or fractions of pennies when scaled against what normal people earn. It's like your average person getting 2p off their weekly shop and bleating when it's stopped - it makes no difference.
As for the £26,000 cap on benefit 'earnings' - well hurrah, about time!
An unskilled worker with three or more kids can't hope to get a job that pays more than benefits - and obviously won't even try, why should they?
I don't think they've got the balls to implement these proposals though, because it more or less guarantees they won't be re-elected