|
Post by movieman36 on Apr 26, 2009 22:45:29 GMT
Hey Lynnrose
I have noticed that different members have different amounts of stars attached to their names. How are these allocated? Is by post frequency, membership duration, age or what?
I see I have only three blue stars and am rated as a Junior member??
MM
|
|
|
Post by ken on Apr 27, 2009 14:26:20 GMT
It depends on how good looking you are MM.
kc
|
|
|
Post by Lynnrose on Apr 27, 2009 17:01:08 GMT
KC's right, but here's the official reason
|
|
|
Post by movieman36 on Apr 27, 2009 18:37:09 GMT
Ah I see. Thanks for that Lynnrose. So if I continually post hundreds of times even if they are complete drivel, I up my star rating . But if I carry on as I always have by only ever posting excellent, informed, knowledgeable, thoughtful, intellectual, enlightened, entertaining, helpful, well judged, authoritative, high quality, pertinent, well researched, relative and comprehensive questions and answers it might take me another year or two to reach the heady heights of full member status?
Thanks
MM ;-)
|
|
|
Post by Lynnrose on Apr 27, 2009 20:09:59 GMT
LMAO love your answer and the simple answer is YES
(don't give up though, you will reach the heady heights of the status of a God one day)
|
|
|
Post by movieman36 on Apr 27, 2009 21:33:55 GMT
Grrrrrrrr
mm
|
|
|
Post by elvisuk on Apr 28, 2009 0:40:13 GMT
H! MM,
This is my territory keep out OK ;D
"So if I continually post hundreds of times even if they are complete drivel,"
|
|
|
Post by elvisuk on Apr 28, 2009 0:41:59 GMT
Well KC i must be exstreamly good looking then
|
|
|
Post by elvisuk on Apr 28, 2009 0:42:57 GMT
Well look 3 more complete drivel post
|
|
|
Post by movieman36 on Apr 28, 2009 8:15:44 GMT
Ah! I see gow it's done now.......
MM
|
|
|
Post by movieman36 on Apr 28, 2009 8:16:17 GMT
A
|
|
|
Post by movieman36 on Apr 28, 2009 8:16:35 GMT
very
|
|
|
Post by movieman36 on Apr 28, 2009 8:16:57 GMT
Good
|
|
|
Post by movieman36 on Apr 28, 2009 8:17:14 GMT
way
|
|
|
Post by movieman36 on Apr 28, 2009 8:17:30 GMT
of
|
|
|
Post by movieman36 on Apr 28, 2009 8:17:58 GMT
doing
|
|
|
Post by movieman36 on Apr 28, 2009 8:18:21 GMT
it!
|
|
|
Post by movieman36 on Apr 28, 2009 8:18:42 GMT
But
|
|
|
Post by movieman36 on Apr 28, 2009 8:19:17 GMT
I
|
|
|
Post by movieman36 on Apr 28, 2009 8:19:41 GMT
think
|
|
|
Post by movieman36 on Apr 28, 2009 8:20:01 GMT
I
|
|
|
Post by movieman36 on Apr 28, 2009 8:20:26 GMT
have
|
|
|
Post by movieman36 on Apr 28, 2009 8:20:59 GMT
found
|
|
|
Post by movieman36 on Apr 28, 2009 8:21:17 GMT
a
|
|
|
Post by movieman36 on Apr 28, 2009 8:21:36 GMT
better
|
|
|
Post by movieman36 on Apr 28, 2009 8:21:51 GMT
way.....
|
|
|
Post by ken on Apr 28, 2009 8:30:50 GMT
That will work MM, bit like reading Chinese calligraphy.
KC
|
|
|
Post by elvisuk on Apr 28, 2009 12:36:29 GMT
That
|
|
|
Post by elvisuk on Apr 28, 2009 12:36:53 GMT
is
|
|
|
Post by elvisuk on Apr 28, 2009 12:37:10 GMT
s
|
|